Within Celebrity UFO Files
How Tom De Longe Changed the UFO Debate
Tom DeLonge helped connect celebrity attention, former officials and military footage in a campaign that reshaped public discussion.
On this page
- From musician to organised advocate
- Building a network of officials and media
- The lasting shift in public attention
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Tom DeLonge changed the modern UFO debate less by proving an extraordinary claim than by building an unusually effective advocacy network. The Blink-182 musician used celebrity access, private meetings, entertainment projects and a public-benefit company to connect former defence and intelligence officials with journalists, military witnesses and a mass audience. The network’s decisive achievement was to present unidentified aerial phenomena, or UAP, as an aviation-safety and national-security issue rather than solely as a story about alien visitors.
That strategy helped military footage and pilot testimony reach mainstream news in 2017, supported pressure for more consistent reporting inside the US Navy and supplied recognisable public advocates such as former Pentagon official Christopher Mellon and former intelligence officer Luis Elizondo. Yet the network also mixed careful institutional arguments with speculative claims, ambitious aerospace proposals and commercial entertainment. DeLonge’s importance therefore lies chiefly in agenda-setting: he helped create the conditions in which officials, legislators and major media organisations could discuss UFO reports without automatically treating the subject as career-ending or absurd.[wired.com]wired.comWhat Is Up With Those Pentagon UFO Videos?The article included videos of UAPs and featured accounts from Navy pilots. The program, Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program…
From musician to organised advocate
DeLonge had discussed UFOs publicly for years, but his approach became more organised in the mid-2010s. Rather than remaining a celebrity enthusiast who gave interviews about personal beliefs, he pursued contacts within political, military and intelligence circles. Emails published during the 2016 leak of John Podesta’s correspondence showed DeLonge seeking meetings about what he described as sensitive government and defence matters. The messages did not verify his wider UFO theories, but they demonstrated that his outreach to well-connected officials was real rather than merely promotional.[CBS News]cbsnews.comCBS NewsRoswell, ET Among Topics In Leaked Emails From Blink 182 Rocker, Apollo Astronaut To Clinton Adviser - CBS Los AngelesOctober 11…
His early Sekret Machines project also revealed the method he intended to use. It combined fiction, purportedly factual material, music and planned screen productions in a single narrative universe. DeLonge argued that popular culture could prepare audiences for complex or unsettling information more effectively than a conventional research organisation could. In practice, this meant treating storytelling not as a side activity but as part of the disclosure campaign itself: entertainment would attract attention, while former officials would lend institutional weight.[GQ]gq.comTom De Longe Has Something Very Important to Tell YouHis new transmedia venture, Sekret Machines, includes novels, nonfiction, a documentary, and music under his company To the Stars Inc. Th…
That model became formal in 2017 with To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science, commonly known as TTSA. Its incorporation and fundraising documents described an organisation spanning entertainment, science and aerospace. The company offered shares to the public under a US Regulation A offering, initially seeking between $1 million and $50 million. Its own filing acknowledged that the valuation was speculative, that revenue had not funded its planned science and aerospace work, and that it remained dependent on raising capital.[SEC]sec.govv473169 partiiandiiiv473169 partiiandiii
The structure was significant because it turned DeLonge’s fame into organisational infrastructure. He was not presenting himself as the network’s best physicist, intelligence analyst or military investigator. His practical value was as a recruiter, fundraiser, media entrepreneur and public-facing convenor. Former insiders who might struggle to attract a broad audience on their own could appear inside a venture whose founder already understood publicity, fan communities and cross-media promotion.
Building a network of officials and media
TTSA’s influence came principally from the people assembled around DeLonge. The founding group and early team included figures with experience in intelligence, defence policy, aerospace engineering and unconventional research. Among the most consequential were:
- Luis Elizondo, a former Department of Defense intelligence employee who said he had directed work associated with the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, or AATIP.
- Christopher Mellon, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and former staff director on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
- Steve Justice, who had held a senior role in advanced systems at Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works.
- Jim Semivan, a former CIA officer and TTSA co-founder.
- Hal Puthoff, a physicist associated with earlier government-funded research into unconventional subjects.
This was not simply a celebrity endorsement campaign. DeLonge placed recognisable national-security credentials at the centre of the presentation. Mellon could frame UAP reports as failures of intelligence collection and airspace awareness. Elizondo could speak as a former insider frustrated by institutional resistance. Justice could associate the organisation with advanced aerospace development. The combination allowed TTSA to address several audiences at once: UFO enthusiasts, journalists, military personnel, investors and policymakers.
The network’s most effective message was deliberately narrower than DeLonge’s personal cosmology. Mellon in particular argued that unknown objects reported near military training areas should be investigated regardless of whether they were foreign aircraft, drones, sensor anomalies or something more exotic. That framing reduced the need to prove extraterrestrial origin before demanding official attention. An unidentified incursion into restricted airspace could be a legitimate defence problem even when its cause remained ordinary or unresolved.[HISTORY]history.comAre UFOs a Threat to National Security?This Ex-US Official Thinks They Warrant Investigation | HISTORYAre UFOs a Threat to National Security? This Ex-US Official Thinks They Wa…
This division of labour mattered. DeLonge supplied celebrity reach and a strong disclosure narrative; Mellon supplied a policy argument; Elizondo supplied an insider account; pilots supplied first-hand testimony; and entertainment partners turned those elements into accessible stories. The network was strongest when these roles reinforced one another without requiring the public to accept every speculative claim made by individual participants.
The 2017 footage campaign
The crucial turning point came in December 2017, when The New York Times reported on a Pentagon programme that had investigated unusual aerial encounters. Alongside the reporting, TTSA published infrared recordings associated with US Navy incidents. The footage later became widely known as “FLIR1”, “Gimbal” and “GoFast”. TTSA’s site promoted the videos together with pilot accounts and commentary from its former officials, creating a coordinated package of imagery, witnesses and institutional biography.[WIRED]wired.comWhat Is Up With Those Pentagon UFO Videos?The article included videos of UAPs and featured accounts from Navy pilots. The program, Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program…
The videos were powerful media objects because they looked different from the anonymous, unstable clips that had long circulated in UFO culture. They came from military sensor systems; voices of aircrew could be heard reacting; and former defence officials were available to explain why the recordings deserved investigation. Their value to the advocacy network did not depend on showing an alien vehicle. They demonstrated that trained personnel sometimes encountered objects or sensor returns they could not immediately identify, and that the military possessed records connected to those incidents.
TTSA initially described the footage as having passed a defence review and being cleared for unrestricted release. The later official account was more complicated. When the Department of Defense formally published the three videos in April 2020, it characterised their earlier public circulation as unauthorised. It said the recordings themselves were unclassified and released them to settle questions about whether the circulating footage was genuine. Official confirmation established that the clips were authentic military imagery; it did not establish extraordinary performance, extraterrestrial origin or even a single explanation linking all three incidents.[WIRED]wired.comOpen source on wired.com.
That distinction is central to understanding DeLonge’s impact. TTSA was successful in getting authentic material into public discussion, but authenticity and interpretation are separate questions. A genuine military video can still be ambiguous. Apparent motion may be influenced by the observing aircraft, camera geometry, range uncertainty, infrared effects or incomplete contextual data. The Pentagon’s later release validated the recordings as real, not the strongest conclusions attached to them by advocates.
Nevertheless, the campaign changed the media environment. The story no longer depended on whether readers trusted a rock musician’s claims. It rested on a network that included named pilots, identifiable former officials, documented government programmes and military sensor footage. DeLonge’s celebrity opened the door, but the institutional composition of the network allowed the subject to remain in the room.
Turning publicity into pressure
After the 2017 coverage, TTSA’s former officials continued to promote UAP as a reporting and oversight problem. Mellon spoke publicly about unidentified activity near military ranges and argued that information was not moving effectively through normal defence and intelligence channels. Elizondo repeatedly described stigma and organisational resistance as barriers that discouraged personnel from reporting unusual encounters.
In 2019, the US Navy confirmed that it was developing more formal procedures for personnel to report unexplained aerial events. Reporting at the time linked the change to an increase in incidents around military operating areas and to concern that observations were being inconsistently recorded. Mellon and Elizondo publicly welcomed the policy shift and had been pressing the same institutional argument: reports should enter a standard system rather than disappear because witnesses feared ridicule or did not know where to send them.[HISTORY]history.comNavy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unidentified Aerial Phenomena | HISTORYNavy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unide…
It would be too strong to say that DeLonge or TTSA alone caused the Navy’s action. The service had its own operational reasons to improve reporting, including drone activity and possible threats around controlled airspace. The advocacy network’s contribution was to amplify the issue, connect journalists with military witnesses and give policymakers a ready-made national-security vocabulary for discussing it.
The History Channel series Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation extended that work. The programme followed Elizondo, Mellon and other participants as they interviewed witnesses and examined military cases. It was entertainment television, not a scientific review, but it served a strategic purpose: active-duty and former aviators could describe incidents in a format reaching viewers far beyond specialist UFO communities. History later credited the series with providing a venue in which some Navy pilots discussed their experiences publicly.[HISTORY]history.comNavy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unidentified Aerial Phenomena | HISTORYNavy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unide…
This illustrates DeLonge’s most distinctive implementation choice. He did not build a conventional advocacy group that separated lobbying, research and entertainment. He built a media-driven network in which each activity promoted the others. Television generated witnesses and public recognition; former officials generated credibility; military footage generated news; news generated political interest; and DeLonge’s celebrity sustained attention between official developments.
Where the network overreached
The same hybrid structure that made TTSA effective also created credibility problems. Its corporate filings described not only media production and UAP investigation but proposed aerospace systems, advanced propulsion, consciousness-related research and the study of unusual materials. In its early offering documents, the company openly stated that it had not generated revenue from the aerospace and science projects it hoped to pursue and that its valuation was highly speculative.[SEC]sec.govv473169 partiiandiiiv473169 partiiandiii
Financial disclosures also showed how far the operating reality remained from the organisation’s grand ambitions. TTSA reported substantial losses and relied on fundraising, loans and the revenue-producing entertainment division. A 2018 filing said the company had raised roughly $1.09 million through its Regulation A offering by that point, far below the original maximum of $50 million. The documents are valuable because they show TTSA as a risky early-stage media and research business, not a fully funded aerospace laboratory backed by the US government.[SEC]sec.govtv492460 partiitv492460 partii
The organisation’s materials programme attracted similar scrutiny. TTSA purchased samples described as potentially unusual “metamaterials” and sought to investigate claims about their properties. The existence of a sample and a research agreement did not establish that it came from a UFO or possessed extraordinary characteristics. Even TTSA acknowledged problems with provenance and the need for independent verification. Critics proposed ordinary industrial explanations for some layered metal specimens, illustrating the gap between an intriguing object, a documented chain of custody and proof of non-human manufacture.[Wikipedia]WikipediaTo The Stars IncTo The Stars Inc
DeLonge himself frequently made claims extending far beyond what TTSA’s strongest public evidence could support. His interviews and publications mixed reports of military encounters with assertions about secrecy, non-human intelligence, recovered technology and wider historical narratives. The network’s policy case did not require those assertions to be true, but audiences often encountered them together. This allowed supporters to treat government interest in unidentified incidents as confirmation of a much larger hidden story.
Later official reviews have not validated that leap. The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, reported in 2024 that it had found no verifiable evidence that the US government or private industry possessed extraterrestrial technology. Its historical review argued that some allegations arose from authentic classified programmes being mistakenly associated with alien activity, repeated through overlapping networks and then treated as independent confirmation. AARO’s conclusions remain disputed by some advocates, but they underline why credentialed sources and genuine military records must not be mistaken for proof of DeLonge’s broadest claims.[U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govDOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINALDOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
A network that outgrew its founder
By the end of 2020, several of TTSA’s most prominent national-security figures were preparing to move on. Elizondo described the organisation’s initial phase as a completed mission and indicated that he, Mellon and Justice were seeking other ways to advance the subject. Their departure reflected a structural tension: TTSA remained a media and entertainment company, while its government-facing advocates increasingly wanted to concentrate on policy, disclosure and congressional engagement.[A Singular Fortean]singularfortean.comOpen source on singularfortean.com.
The departure did not undo the network’s influence. In one sense, it showed that DeLonge’s organising model had succeeded. The officials he had helped place before a large audience no longer needed the company as their sole platform. UAP reporting had become a subject of congressional briefings, defence reviews, inspector-general activity and dedicated government offices. A Department of Defense Inspector General evaluation announced in 2021, for example, examined how the department had handled UAP across military services, combatant commands and intelligence agencies.[U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govOpen source on defense.gov.
The advocacy network also changed who could speak about the subject. Before 2017, a former official discussing UFOs risked being absorbed into a subculture defined by anonymous leaks and sensational claims. TTSA provided a transitional space in which officials could speak through the language of airspace security, data collection and oversight while still reaching audiences drawn by the possibility of extraterrestrial technology.
That shift did not settle the underlying evidence. Many reports remain explainable, data are often incomplete, and an unresolved case is not automatically an extraordinary one. Modern scientific proposals for UAP research emphasise calibrated, multimodal instruments—cameras, radar, spectroscopy, environmental sensors and triangulation—precisely because testimony and short military clips rarely provide enough information for decisive conclusions.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.
The lasting shift in public attention
Tom DeLonge’s lasting contribution was to recognise that the UFO debate had an institutional bottleneck as well as an evidential one. Pilots might have observations but lack a trusted reporting route. Former officials might possess relevant experience but lack a public platform. Journalists might be interested but need named, credible sources and authenticated material. Audiences might be curious but accustomed to seeing the subject presented as either ridicule or unquestioned belief.
His network addressed those problems by linking people who could not have produced the same effect separately. Celebrity gave the campaign reach; government résumés gave it seriousness; military footage gave it a concrete focus; television gave it continuity; and the national-security framing gave officials a defensible reason to engage.
The result was not official confirmation of alien visitation. It was a change in the threshold for public discussion. Military personnel could report unusual observations without necessarily endorsing extraterrestrial explanations. Legislators could ask whether airspace incursions were being recorded properly. Defence agencies could authenticate footage while withholding judgement about what it depicted. Mainstream news organisations could investigate government UFO programmes without presenting the story purely as novelty.
That is why DeLonge occupies a distinct place among celebrities associated with UFOs. Other famous figures have reported sightings, promoted documentaries or offered theories. DeLonge built an operational bridge between celebrity culture and national-security institutions. Its claims were uneven, its commercial ambitions often exceeded its demonstrated capacity, and its most dramatic conclusions remain unproven. Yet the network succeeded at something more measurable: it helped move UAP from a marginal cultural fascination into a sustained argument about military reporting, transparency and the quality of evidence.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Tom De Longe Changed the UFO Debate. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go On the Record
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology
More than half of American adults and more than seventy-five percent of young Americans believe in intelligent extraterrestrial life. Thi...
Sekret Machines Book 1: Chasing Shadows
"Blurring the line of science fiction and fact, Sekret Machines is an explosive thriller that will make you question everything you've be...
Sekret Machines: Gods
An exceptional examination that “plays the role of an intellectual Indiana Jones, expertly guiding readers through crumbling, vine-laden...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromufo poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: wired.com
Title: What Is Up With Those Pentagon UFO Videos?
Link:https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-up-with-those-pentagon-ufo-videos
Source snippet
The article included videos of UAPs and featured accounts from Navy pilots. The program, Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program...
2.
Source: history.com
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/navy-confirms-ufo-videos-real
Source snippet
Navy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unidentified Aerial Phenomena | HISTORYNavy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unide...
3.
Source: history.com
Title: Are UFOs a Threat to National Security?
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/chris-mellon-ufo-investigations
Source snippet
This Ex-US Official Thinks They Warrant Investigation | HISTORYAre UFOs a Threat to National Security? This Ex-US Official Thinks They Wa...
4.
Source: entrepreneur.com
Link:https://www.entrepreneur.com/leadership/the-former-singer-of-blink-182-is-creating-a-sci-fi-disney/306267
Source snippet
The Former Singer of Blink-182 Is Creating a Sci-Fi Disney for Millennials (and It Studies UFOs, Too)The Former Singer of Bli...
5.
Source: sec.gov
Title: v473169 partiiandiii
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1710274/000114420417043466/v473169_partiiandiii.htm
6.
Source: wired.com
Link:https://www.wired.com/story/does-it-matter-that-the-dod-released-those-ufo-videos
7.
Source: sec.gov
Title: tv530141 1sa
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1710274/000114420419046318/tv530141_1sa.htm
8.
Source: sec.gov
Title: tv492460 partii
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1710274/000114420418023727/tv492460_partii.htm
9.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: To The Stars Inc
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_the_Stars_Inc
10.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=android&ref=app
11.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/May/04/2002633947/-1/-1/1/D2021-DEV0SN-0116.000_REDACTED.PDF
12.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566
13.
Source: sec.gov
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000191870426020073
14.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidentified%3A_Inside_America%27s_UFO_Investigation
15.
Source: sec.gov
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819142/000181914225000067/0001819142-25-000067-index.htm
16.
Source: sec.gov
Title: form1 sa
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1710274/000149315225015870/form1-sa.htm
17.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: To the Stars
Link:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_the_Stars
18.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: FY24 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT ON UAP 508
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Nov/14/2003583603/-1/-1/0/FY24-CONSOLIDATED-ANNUAL-REPORT-ON-UAP-508.PDF?ftag=MSF0951a18
19.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=av…VdmGCEzR&ref=app
20.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=v&ref=app
21.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=av.&ref=app
22.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Nov/23/2002898596/-1/-1/0/ESTABLISHMENT-OF-THE-AIRBORNE-OBJECT-IDENTIFICATION-AND-MANAGEMENT-SYNCHRONIZATION-GROUP.PDF
23.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jun/25/2002749916/-1/-1/1/DEPUTY-SECRETARY-OF-%20DEFENSE-MEMORANDUM-ON-UNIDENTIFIED-AERIAL-PHENOMENA-ASSESSMENTS.PDF
24.
Source: sec.gov
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/25445/000162828020009842/a201911-k.htm
25.
Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/serve-from-netstorage/Multimedia/Videos?videoid=743686
26.
Source: sec.gov
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1224133/000156459019030869/R23.htm
27.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: PRELIMINARY AIR ACTIVITY REPORT 0575
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Aug/04/2002821898/0/0/0/PRELIMINARY%20AIR%20ACTIVITY%20REPORT%200575.PDF
28.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF
29.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Jan/25/2003381266/-1/-1/1/UNCLASSIFIED%20SUMMARY_UNIDENTIFIED%20ANOMALOUS%20PHENOMENA%20SECURE.PDF
30.
Source: sec.gov
Title: cwh 20161231x10k
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1669779/000155837017001687/cwh-20161231x10k.htm
31.
Source: sec.gov
Link:https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1810783&owner=exclude
32.
Source: adviserinfo.sec.gov
Link:https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/firm/brochure/334043
33.
Source: sec.gov
Title: Exhibit 21.1
Link:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1308547/000130854712000010/exhibit211-significantsubs.htm
34.
Source: cbsnews.com
Link:https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/roswell-et-among-topics-in-leaked-emails-from-blink-182-rocker-apollo-astronaut-to-clinton-adviser/
Source snippet
CBS NewsRoswell, ET Among Topics In Leaked Emails From Blink 182 Rocker, Apollo Astronaut To Clinton Adviser - CBS Los AngelesOctober 11...
35.
Source: gq.com
Title: Tom [De Longe]({{ ‘de-longe/’ | relative_url }}) Has Something Very Important to Tell You
Link:https://www.gq.com/story/tom-delonge-ufos-interview-sekret-machines-novel
Source snippet
His new transmedia venture, Sekret Machines, includes novels, nonfiction, a documentary, and music under his company To the Stars Inc. Th...
36.
Source: cbsnews.com
Link:https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/pentagon-declassifies-3-ufo-videos-after-blink-182s-tom-delonge-leaked-them/
37.
Source: singularfortean.com
Link:https://www.singularfortean.com/news/2020/12/22/luis-elizondo-implies-in-coast-to-coast-am-interview-that-he-chris-mellon-and-steve-justice-will-soon-leave-to-the-stars-academy
38.
Source: uapdisclosurereads.com
Title: Christopher Mellon
Link:https://uapdisclosurereads.com/people/christopher-mellon/
39.
Source: disclosdex.com
Title: Christopher Mellon | Disclosdex
Link:https://disclosdex.com/people/christopher-mellon
40.
Source: disclosdex.com
Title: Tom De Longe | Disclosdex
Link:https://disclosdex.com/people/tom-delonge
41.
Source: en.ikwipedia.org
Title: Luis Elizondo
Link:https://en.ikwipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Elizondo
42.
Source: thegraphictruth.io
Title: Luis Elizondo | The Graphic Truth
Link:https://thegraphictruth.io/uap-disclosure/person/luis-elizondo
43.
Source: disclosdex.com
Title: To The Stars Academy | Disclosdex
Link:https://disclosdex.com/organizations/to-the-stars-academy
44.
Source: decur.org
Title: To The Stars Academy
Link:https://decur.org/programs/ttsa
Additional References
45.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFT38RtFdj4
Source snippet
UFO Cover-Up | Unidentified: Inside America's UFO Investigation | Full Episode...
46.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Cover-Up | Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation | Full Episode
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_swaZVvpyZo
Source snippet
Meanwhile... Blink-182 Founder Plays Central Role In Release Of UFO Footage...
47.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hc5nIvBDQo
Source snippet
Tom Delonge Explains His UFO Obsession to Joe Rogan JRE Clips · 1M views...
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Tom Delonge: Skinwalkers & CIA Spooks | With Jim Semivan
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBSdg3nwxoo
Source snippet
UFO videos posted by Blink-182 are real and never should have been released, Navy confirms...
49.
Source: wsj.com
Link:https://www.wsj.com/articles/wikileaks-reveals-ufo-messages-in-clinton-campaign-emails-1476123038
Source snippet
10, 2016 2:10 pm ET The former lead...
50.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Tom Delonge Explains His UFO Obsession to Joe Rogan
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-wVdi_Vcsw
Source snippet
Tom Delonge: Skinwalkers & CIA Spooks | With Jim Semivan...
51.
Source: aegm.com
Link:https://www.aegm.com/article/history-greenlights-new-limited-non-fiction-series-unidentified-inside-americas-ufo-investigation-executive-produced-by-tom-delonge
52.
Source: ufotransparency.com
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/decade-2020s-dod-navy-video-official-release-2020-navair-foia-documents-page
53.
Source: independent.co.uk
Link:https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/hillary-clinton-campaign-podesta-election-presidential-tom-delonge-aliens-extraterrestrials-a7355806.html
54.
Source: axios.com
Link:https://www.axios.com/2019/04/27/navy-reports-increase-ufo-sightings