Within Celebrity UFO Files
What the Pentagon UFO Videos Really Confirmed
The military origin of the famous videos was confirmed, but celebrity promotion often encouraged interpretations beyond what the footage proved.
On this page
- How the recordings entered public view
- What official authentication meant
- Why authenticity is not proof of aliens
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The famous “Pentagon UFO videos” confirmed something important but limited: the recordings were genuine US Navy footage, captured by military sensor systems during encounters that officials had not identified at the time. They did not confirm alien spacecraft, impossible technology or even that every apparent movement in the clips represented the object’s real motion. The US Department of Defense explicitly released the three videos—commonly called FLIR1, Gimbal and GoFast—to settle questions about whether the circulating footage was authentic, while leaving the recorded phenomena classified simply as “unidentified”.[U.S. Department of War]war.govstatement by the department of defense on the release of historical navy videosDepartment of WarStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Press Product…(https://www.war.gov/News/Press-Products/%20Releases/Release/Article/2165713/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/)
Their cultural impact was much larger than that cautious finding. Tom DeLonge, the musician best known for Blink-182, and his organisation To the Stars Academy helped place the recordings before a mass audience alongside former defence and intelligence figures. That unusual combination of military imagery, insider testimony and celebrity publicity turned short, ambiguous infrared clips into symbols of a supposed UFO “disclosure” era. The central evidential mistake was to treat official authentication as validation of the most dramatic interpretation.
How the recordings entered public view
The three videos came from two periods of US Navy activity. FLIR1 was recorded in November 2004 during the encounter associated with the USS Nimitz carrier group. Gimbal and GoFast were recorded in January 2015 by aircraft operating from the USS Theodore Roosevelt. They are monochrome targeting-pod recordings rather than ordinary visible-light films, and their displays include information such as viewing angle, sensor mode and estimated range.[U.S. Department of War]war.govstatement by the department of defense on the release of historical navy videosDepartment of WarStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Press Product…(https://www.war.gov/News/Press-Products/%20Releases/Release/Article/2165713/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/)
FLIR1 had circulated online in some form from 2007. The modern wave of attention began in December 2017, when The New York Times reported on a Pentagon-funded UFO research effort and published two of the clips. To the Stars Academy released the same material through its own platform, presenting it as official evidence of unidentified aerial phenomena. The third clip, GoFast, received wide exposure in 2018.[WIRED]wired.comWhat Is Up With Those Pentagon UFO Videos?The article included videos of UAPs and featured accounts from Navy pilots. The program, Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program…
The timing mattered. To the Stars Academy had been launched publicly in October 2017 by DeLonge with a team that included former government and defence personnel, notably Luis Elizondo, who said he had managed a Pentagon UFO-investigation effort, and former deputy assistant secretary of defence Christopher Mellon. DeLonge brought an existing fan base, media fluency and a long-publicised personal interest in extraterrestrial claims. His colleagues provided institutional vocabulary and apparent proximity to classified government work. Together, they could promote the videos in a way that neither a conventional UFO group nor a celebrity acting alone could have achieved.[Entrepreneur]entrepreneur.comThe Former Singer of Blink-182 Is Creating a Sci-Fi Disney for Millennials (and It Studies UFOs, Too)December 18, 2017 — The…
This was not simply a case of a musician mentioning UFOs in an interview. To the Stars combined advocacy, entertainment and commercial media production. DeLonge described an enterprise spanning books, films, music, research and advanced technology, while its members used interviews, conferences and television to argue that unidentified encounters deserved official attention. That structure helped the videos travel between different audiences: defence reporting, popular science, music fandom, cable television and longstanding UFO communities.[Entrepreneur]entrepreneur.comThe Former Singer of Blink-182 Is Creating a Sci-Fi Disney for Millennials (and It Studies UFOs, Too)December 18, 2017 — The…
The initial release history was also less straightforward than the label “Pentagon-released videos” suggested. In 2017, the clips were publicly distributed through journalism and To the Stars rather than posted as a formal Department of Defense release. Contemporary reporting raised questions about the precise approval process and whether paperwork allowing material to leave government custody amounted to authorisation for unrestricted public publication. The Pentagon later described the earlier circulation as unauthorised.[wired.com]wired.comWhat Is Up With Those Pentagon UFO Videos?The article included videos of UAPs and featured accounts from Navy pilots. The program, Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program…
That ambiguity helped publicity. Advocates could present the footage as material that insiders had succeeded in bringing out of secrecy, while critics could question its provenance and missing context. By April 2020, the recordings were already globally familiar. The Pentagon’s formal publication did not introduce unknown footage; it authenticated and standardised material that had already been promoted for years.
What official authentication meant
On 27 April 2020, the Department of Defense authorised the release of all three videos. Its statement was carefully framed. It confirmed that they were unclassified Navy recordings made in 2004 and 2015, said their release would not expose sensitive capabilities or interfere with later investigations, and explained that publication was intended to clear up misconceptions about whether the circulating footage was genuine or whether additional material had been hidden within the clips. It concluded that the recorded phenomena remained “unidentified”.[U.S. Department of War]war.govstatement by the department of defense on the release of historical navy videosDepartment of WarStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Press Product…(https://www.war.gov/News/Press-Products/%20Releases/Release/Article/2165713/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/)
That authentication established several points:
- The clips were not fabricated fan videos or computer-generated hoaxes.
- They originated in US Navy aviation operations.
- The cockpit displays and voices belonged to real military recordings.
- Officials had not publicly assigned a confirmed identity to the objects shown.
- The Pentagon considered the released versions safe to publish without exposing protected technical information.
None of those findings determined what the objects were. “Unidentified” described the status of the available assessment, not a physical category. It did not mean extraterrestrial, technologically revolutionary or incapable of ordinary explanation.
The distinction is especially important because a sensor recording is not a transparent window onto an event. Infrared targeting systems translate heat contrast into an image, stabilise the picture and track targets while both the aircraft and sensor head are moving. Apparent shape, speed and rotation can therefore depend on range, viewing geometry, image processing, glare and the motion of the observing aircraft. A real military video can authentically record a misleading visual impression.[AARO]aaro.milEffect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP ObservationsEffect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP Observations
Official language was often simplified as it moved through headlines and celebrity commentary. “The Navy confirms the videos are real” could easily become “the Navy confirms UFOs are real”, and then “the Pentagon admits extraordinary craft are real”. The first formulation is broadly accurate if “real” refers to the recordings. The second is true only in the limited sense that military personnel sometimes record objects they cannot immediately identify. The third adds a conclusion the Pentagon did not make.
DeLonge himself promoted the 2020 decision as a major vindication. He told Rolling Stone that the Navy and Pentagon had acknowledged that the videos and objects were real, characterised the development as something his team had helped force into public view, and predicted much more consequential disclosure. His enthusiasm illustrates the gap between official and promotional framing: the Department of Defense authenticated recordings and retained an unresolved label, while DeLonge presented the moment as confirmation of a much larger UFO narrative.[Rolling Stone Australia]au.rollingstone.comOpen source on rollingstone.com.
Celebrity promotion did not create the underlying incidents. It did, however, affect which interpretation reached the public first and most forcefully. Most viewers did not encounter the clips through a technical explanation of infrared sensors, missing metadata and uncertainty ranges. They encountered them as “UFO videos”, frequently accompanied by claims from former officials that the objects displayed capabilities beyond known aircraft.
Why the clips do not prove extraordinary craft
Each video presents a different analytical problem, and the footage alone supplies less information than its dramatic reputation implies.
GoFast appears at first glance to show a small object racing just above the sea. The visual effect is compelling because the background moves rapidly beneath it. In 2025, the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, published a detailed reconstruction using values visible on the display. It assessed that the object was approximately 13,000 feet above the ocean, not skimming the surface, and was travelling somewhere between about 5 and 92 miles per hour. AARO could not identify it, but concluded that it showed no anomalous performance. Its apparently extreme speed was largely a parallax effect created by viewing an object from a fast-moving aircraft against a distant background.[AARO]aaro.milDepartment of Defense Case: “Go Fast” Case Resolution | February 6, 2025 Case Overview In January 2015, a U.S. Navy F/A-18F pil…
The finding is revealing because GoFast was widely promoted on the basis of exactly the characteristic later weakened by analysis: its apparent velocity. The case remained unidentified at the object level, yet the extraordinary-performance claim did not survive geometric reconstruction. An unknown object travelling at an ordinary speed is evidentially different from a vehicle demonstrating impossible propulsion.
Gimbal shows a dark infrared form that appears to rotate while aircrew react to it. Advocates have treated the apparent rotation, absence of visible wings and reported accompanying radar contacts as signs of unconventional technology. A competing interpretation is that the rotating form is infrared glare associated with a distant heat source and that its apparent turn is linked to the targeting pod’s optical and mechanical behaviour. Public analysis remains contested, partly because the released clip lacks the complete supporting radar, aircraft-position and original sensor data needed to reconstruct the event conclusively.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.
The disagreement does not justify selecting the most exotic explanation. It shows why a short processed clip cannot independently establish an object’s shape or flight characteristics. Even analyses arguing that Gimbal may represent unusual movement rely on assumed distance, pilot recollections and information outside the public video. Alternative jet-and-glare models also depend on assumptions. The footage remains interesting, but its ambiguity is the central fact rather than a technical obstacle that publicity can simply overlook.
FLIR1, associated with the 2004 Nimitz encounter, is likewise only one piece of a broader reported event. Pilot testimony, shipboard radar accounts and the targeting-pod clip are often combined into a single narrative about a white “Tic Tac” object. The released video itself does not show the full encounter described by witnesses, nor does it contain enough public information to establish extraordinary acceleration. Treating every element of the broader story as though it were visibly demonstrated in the clip overstates what the recording contains.
This separation between footage and surrounding testimony is crucial. A pilot may have had a vivid visual encounter; radar operators may have tracked unusual returns; and a targeting pod may later have recorded an object. Whether those observations all involved the same object, how accurately their times and positions can be aligned, and whether the available data exclude ordinary causes are additional questions. The short videos cannot answer them by themselves.
The missing data behind the spectacle
Military provenance can make footage seem more complete than it is. In reality, the publicly available files lack much of what investigators would want for a firm identification: original uncompressed sensor data, complete metadata, exact aircraft tracks, full-length recordings, radar records, weather information, nearby flight activity and calibrated measurements from independent viewpoints.
AARO’s GoFast analysis demonstrates both the value and the limits of the surviving display information. Analysts could estimate a plausible altitude and speed range from numbers visible in the clip, but the original file and associated metadata were no longer available. The aircraft’s exact location and heading were also unknown, preventing a single definitive trajectory from being calculated.[AARO]aaro.milDepartment of Defense Case: “Go Fast” Case Resolution | February 6, 2025 Case Overview In January 2015, a U.S. Navy F/A-18F pil…
Those gaps matter because apparent anomalies are often produced by uncertainty in distance. Without reliable range, a small nearby object and a large distant object can occupy the same angular size in an image. Without a stable external reference, the observer’s own motion can make a slow object appear fast. AARO has highlighted forced perspective and parallax as recurring sources of mistaken estimates of size, position and velocity in UAP reporting.[AARO]aaro.milEffect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP ObservationsEffect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP Observations
NASA’s independent UAP study reached a compatible broader conclusion. It found that intriguing observations usually lack the consistent, calibrated data required for definitive scientific judgements. The report called for standardised reporting, robust metadata and multiple forms of measurement rather than relying on isolated videos or eyewitness impressions.[NASA]nasa.govuap independent study team final report 0uap independent study team final report 0
This does not mean the Navy encounters were trivial or unworthy of investigation. Unidentified objects near military training areas can represent flight hazards, surveillance devices, balloons, drones, sensor problems or misunderstood natural phenomena. Establishing which explanation applies has genuine defence and aviation value. The point is narrower: military concern about an unidentified incursion is not evidence that the incursion was extraterrestrial.
How celebrity promotion changed the meaning
DeLonge’s role was significant because he did more than repeat an existing news story. He helped build a public-facing organisation around former officials who could obtain attention from mainstream journalists and policymakers. His fame reduced the usual barrier between specialised UFO advocacy and mass entertainment, while his longstanding interest made the campaign appear personally authentic rather than manufactured by a publicity firm.
To the Stars also supplied a ready-made narrative for the videos. The footage was not presented merely as unresolved aviation data. It appeared within a larger programme involving alleged government secrecy, advanced technology, insider knowledge and the possibility that extraordinary craft had been observed for decades. The organisation’s entertainment activities reinforced that framing even when individual claims remained unproved.[Entrepreneur]entrepreneur.comThe Former Singer of Blink-182 Is Creating a Sci-Fi Disney for Millennials (and It Studies UFOs, Too)December 18, 2017 — The…
The resulting publicity had constructive effects. It helped normalise discussion of unusual encounters among military aviators, drew attention to weaknesses in reporting systems and encouraged government bodies to treat unidentified incursions as a legitimate safety and intelligence issue. Navy officials said they wanted to reduce stigma so that pilots would report unexplained objects rather than remain silent.[HISTORY]history.comNavy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unidentified Aerial Phenomena | HISTORYNavy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unide…
But the same campaign repeatedly blurred three separate propositions:
- The recordings are authentic.
- The recorded objects were not identified from the available evidence.
- The objects were vehicles with extraordinary or non-human origins.
The Pentagon confirmed the first and retained the second. It did not confirm the third.
Celebrity-led promotion made that distinction harder to maintain because publicity rewards a simple breakthrough story. “Government authenticates previously leaked Navy footage” is precise but qualified. “Pentagon confirms UFOs” is shorter and more shareable. “Musician helps force alien disclosure” is more dramatic still. Each step adds meaning that was not contained in the official statement.
The videos therefore offer a useful lesson in evaluating celebrity UFO advocacy. A famous promoter can be instrumental in locating witnesses, attracting journalists and pressuring institutions to release information. Those achievements affect access and attention, not the physical interpretation of the evidence. The identity and behaviour of an object must still be established through measurements, metadata and analysis that stand independently of the promoter’s confidence.
What the Pentagon videos really confirmed
The enduring importance of FLIR1, Gimbal and GoFast is not that they proved alien visitation. They showed that trained military personnel sometimes encounter and record objects they cannot immediately identify; that official reporting and data retention were inadequate; and that footage from sophisticated sensors can remain ambiguous when crucial context is missing.
They also showed how rapidly evidential categories can collapse in popular culture. “Authentic recording”, “unidentified object” and “extraordinary craft” came to be treated as interchangeable, particularly when promoted by a celebrity-led organisation with former defence insiders and a compelling disclosure narrative.
Later analysis has made the distinction clearer. GoFast’s dramatic apparent speed can be explained largely through geometry, even though the object itself remains unidentified. Gimbal remains disputed because the public clip cannot settle whether its most striking features belong to the object or to the imaging system. FLIR1 does not independently demonstrate the full range of manoeuvres described in the broader Nimitz account. None provides verified evidence of extraterrestrial technology.
The responsible conclusion is neither that the videos are meaningless nor that they reveal alien machines. They are authentic but incomplete military records. Celebrity promotion helped bring them into public view and encouraged serious discussion of UAP reporting, but it also encouraged conclusions beyond what the recordings could prove.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What the Pentagon UFO Videos Really Confirmed. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
In Plain Sight: an Investigation Into UFOs and Impossible Sci...
An award-winning journalist investigates a story largely ignored by mainstream media but right there, in front of our eyes ... UFOs, UAPs...
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories U...
Revised and updated for the first time in 2023—Now includes strategies for debunking conspiracies regarding the coronavirus pandemic, ele...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
FS02 VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A4 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: war.gov
Title: statement by the department of defense on the release of historical [navy videos]({{ ‘navy-videos/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Press-Products/%20Releases/Release/Article/2165713/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/
Source snippet
Department of WarStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Press Product...
2.
Source: war.gov
Title: statement by the department of defense on the release of historical navy videos
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2165713/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/
Source snippet
Department of WarStatement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos > U.S. Department of War > Release | U.S...
3.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/case_resolution_reports/AARO_GoFast_Case_Resolution_Card_Methodology_Final.pdf
Source snippet
Department of Defense Case: “Go Fast” Case Resolution | February 6, 2025 Case Overview In January 2015, a U.S. Navy F/A-18F pil...
Published: February 6, 2025
4.
Source: wired.com
Title: What Is Up With Those Pentagon UFO Videos?
Link:https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-up-with-those-pentagon-ufo-videos
Source snippet
The article included videos of UAPs and featured accounts from Navy pilots. The program, Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program...
5.
Source: history.com
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/navy-confirms-ufo-videos-real
Source snippet
Navy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unidentified Aerial Phenomena | HISTORYNavy Confirms UFO Videos Are Real and Show Unide...
6.
Source: entrepreneur.com
Link:https://www.entrepreneur.com/leadership/the-former-singer-of-blink-182-is-creating-a-sci-fi-disney/306267
Source snippet
The Former Singer of Blink-182 Is Creating a Sci-Fi Disney for Millennials (and It Studies UFOs, Too)December 18, 2017 — The...
Published: December 18, 2017
7.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Effect of Forced Perspective and Parallax View on UAP Observations
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/Information%20Papers/AARO_Effect_of_Forced_Perspective_and_Parallax_View_on_UAP_Observations_2024.pdf
8.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=69fb3c3d5dcea
9.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08773
10.
Source: time.com
Link:https://time.com/5680192/navy-confirms-ufo-videos-real/
11.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/
12.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/dividLink/
13.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Records
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Records/
14.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: CNOTE 9
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jul/01/2003956681/-1/-1/1/CNOTE%209.PDF/CNOTE%209.PDF
15.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AARO FY2025 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/FY25%20UAP%20Annual%20Report/AARO_FY2025_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP.pdf
16.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Acc-Table/
17.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/Very/
18.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Fixed-Table/
19.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O [Go Fast Case]({{ ‘go-fast-case/’ | relative_url }}) Resolution
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/case_resolution_reports/AARO_GoFast_Case_Resolution_Card_Methodology_Final.pdf?ver=qXvjrruO_0MgtnTsfYnCEQ%3D%3D
20.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/SASC_AARO_Open_Hearing_Case_Slides_19Nov2024.pdf?ver=Hec1SwKwP-4zSRJwIEIlJw%3D%3D
21.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: FY25 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT ON UAP 508
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Nov/14/2003583603/-1/-1/0/FY25-CONSOLIDATED-ANNUAL-REPORT-ON-UAP-508.PDF
22.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: PPT 1.0 LEADERSHIP, ADVOCACY, TRUST AND TRADITION 3.0.1
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Aug/16/2003527235/-1/-1/1/PPT%201.0%20LEADERSHIP%2C%20ADVOCACY%2C%20TRUST%20AND%20TRADITION%203.0.1.PDF
23.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Eglin UAP Case Resolution
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/case_resolution_reports/Case_Resolution_of_Eglin_UAP_2508.pdf
24.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/dvpmoduleid/77396/
25.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: HRR VOL I REPORT 08 MARCH 2024
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/HRR-VOL-I-REPORT-08-MARCH-2024.PDF
Published: MARCH 2024
26.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=io…&ref=app
27.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=roku___&ref=app
28.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=dio%3Fno_journeys%3Dtrue&ref=app
29.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1.PDF
30.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=vpkn75tqhopmk&ref=app
31.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=xd4wd&ref=app
32.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: UAP RELATED RECORDS FOIA RELEASE
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Jan/25/2003381254/-1/-1/1/UAP-RELATED%20RECORDS%20FOIA%20RELEASE.PDF
33.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf
34.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf?ver=FDHBtn1AmOwRRjiCO6hBQQ%3D%3D
35.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=6a6167cfe42dd
36.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=68934abe7989a
37.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=69dc0a12a277f
38.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=69a17a1fad135
39.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=6a67a8c547807
40.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=6a498654ad358
41.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=69dbb5c1906e7
42.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=69f2462d35611
43.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=69d7c13547405
44.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=6a5b6fd775399
45.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: uap independent study team final report 0
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report-0.pdf?emrc=69f65620935be
46.
Source: secnav.navy.mil
Title: PAO Briefing Card 2020 012022 and 2022 006563
Link:https://www.secnav.navy.mil/foia/readingroom/CaseFiles/UAP%20INFO/UAP%20DOCUMENTS/PAO%20Briefing%20Card%202020-012022%20and%202022-006563.pdf
47.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jun/25/2002749916/-1/-1/1/DEPUTY-SECRETARY-OF-DEFENSE-MEMORANDUM-ON-UNIDENTIFIED%20-AERIAL-PH%C3%89NOM%C3%88NE-ASSESSMENTS.PDF
48.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jun/25/2002749916/-1/-1/1/DEPUTY-SECRETARY-OF-%20DEFENSE-MEMORANDUM-ON-UNIDENTIFIED-AERIAL-PHENOMENA-ASSESSMENTS.PDF
49.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2020/Dec/16/2002553074/-1/-1/1/TRISERVICESTRATEGY.PDF
50.
Source: navy.mil
Link:https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/2165713/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/
51.
Source: war.gov
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2165713/statement-by-the-department-of-defense-on-the-release-of-historical-navy-videos/
52.
Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/serve-from-netstorage/Multimedia/Videos?videoid=743686
53.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: UNIDENTIFIED ELEMENT ISSUES BATTLE SITUATION
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Aug/10/2002827032/0/0/0/UNIDENTIFIED%20ELEMENT%20ISSUES%20BATTLE%20SITUATION%20SUMMARY%20REPORT%201908.PDF
54.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: NOW YOU SEE
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/13/2002761355/-1/-1/0/NOW_YOU_SEE.PDF
55.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: NAVY REPORT CUBA
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/13/2002761363/-1/-1/0/NAVY_REPORT_CUBA.PDF
56.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: COMINT PART E
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/13/2002761335/-1/-1/0/COMINT_PART_E.PDF
57.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: COMINT PART D
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/13/2002761334/-1/-1/0/COMINT_PART_D.PDF
58.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: FINAL ACTION MII AUF INCIDENT 30 AUG 2016
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2017/Oct/05/2001823150/-1/-1/0/FINAL_ACTION_MII_AUF_INCIDENT_30_AUG_2016.PDF
59.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: FINAL ACTION MII AUF INC1DENT 30 AUG 2016
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2017/Oct/05/2001823150/-l/-1/0/FINAL_ACTION_MII_AUF_INC1DENT_30_AUG_2016.PDF
60.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: STATION HAS VOICE TAPES
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jul/18/2002804707/-1/-1/0/STATION-HAS-VOICE-TAPES.PDF
61.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Bruce-working/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends-Charts/
62.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR CLEARED 508 COMPLIANT HRRV1 08 MAR 2024 FINAL
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-CLEARED-508-COMPLIANT-HRRV1-08-MAR-2024-FINAL.PDF?os=__&ref=app
63.
Source: media.defense.gov
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Jan/25/2003381266/-1/-1/1/UNCLASSIFIED%20SUMMARY_UNIDENTIFIED%20ANOMALOUS%20PHENOMENA%20SECURE.PDF
64.
Source: history.defense.gov
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Multimedia/Experience/UFOs/
65.
Source: history.defense.gov
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/secretaryofdefense/OSDSeries_Vol4.pdf
66.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: FISCAL YEAR 2023 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT ON UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2023/Oct/18/2003323080/-1/-1/1/FISCAL-YEAR-2023-CONSOLIDATED-ANNUAL-REPORT-ON-UNIDENTIFIED-ANOMALOUS-PHENOMENA.PDF
67.
Source: innovation.defense.gov
Link:https://innovation.defense.gov/Media/Images/?igtag=Secretary+of+Defense
68.
Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/Videos/videoid/Newsroom/?releases=index.html
69.
Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Rooms/Press-Releases/2020/12/Laser-Induced-Breakdown-Spectroscopy-LIBS/
70.
Source: history.defense.gov
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Multimedia/
71.
Source: history.defense.gov
Link:https://history.defense.gov/
72.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/AARO-UAP-Case-Resolution-DT/
73.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/AARO-UAP-Case-DT/
74.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Case-Resolution-Reports/
75.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006063/dvpcc/false/
76.
Source: au.rollingstone.com
Link:https://au.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/tom-delonge-ufo-video-pentagon-release-blink-182-10815/
Additional References
77.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: afosi investigation into unauthorized release of three ufo videos 2018
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/afosi-investigation-into-unauthorized-release-of-three-ufo-videos-2018/
Source snippet
The Black VaultAFOSI Investigation Into Unauthorized Release of Three UFO Videos, 2018 - The Black VaultAFOSI Investigation Into Unauthor...
78.
Source: youtube.com
Title: [Tom De Longe]({{ ‘tom-de-longe/’ | relative_url }}) discusses To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kra8xOHA9Jc
Source snippet
Tom DeLonge Pentagon UFO videos To The Stars Academy Tom delonge's to the stars academy posts declassified ufo videos...
79.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Tom [De Longe]({{ ‘de-longe/’ | relative_url }}) Talks New Angels & Airwaves, UFOs, Radio + More
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssOuR7xI7xk
Source snippet
Tom Delonge: Skinwalkers & CIA Spooks | With Jim Semivan...
80.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Navy Confirms UFO Videos Posted by Tom De Longe Are Real
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4WBZrlxLfs
Source snippet
Tom DeLonge Talks New Angels & Airwaves, UFOs, Radio + More...
81.
Source: youtube.com
Title: What Happened To Tom Delonge & To The Stars Academy?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLGRZLjFjSE
Source snippet
Tom DeLonge discusses To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science...
82.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Tom Delonge: Skinwalkers & CIA Spooks | With Jim Semivan
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBSdg3nwxoo
Source snippet
What Happened To Tom Delonge & To The Stars Academy?...
83.
Source: veritauniversale.it
Link:https://www.veritauniversale.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Dichiarazione-del-Dipartimento-della-Difesa-sulla-pubblicazione-di-video-storici-della-Marina.pdf
84.
Source: emergentmind.com
Link:https://www.emergentmind.com/papers/2306.08773
85.
Source: theblackvault.com
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/navy-withheld-nearly-500-pages-about-uap-video-release-decision-records-show-foia-pressure-drove-disclosure/
86.
Source: nowdeclassified.com
Link:https://www.nowdeclassified.com/guides/gimbal-uap-video-explained